Search for: "Health Care for All et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al"
Results 1 - 17
of 17
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2010, 4:17 pm
Merck & Co., Inc. et al; Simonian v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 12:41 pm
Brief in opposition of respondents Independent Living Center of Southern California, Inc. et al. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 9:45 am
For example, in 2009, Pfizer Inc. reached a settlement with the federal government and states over allegations of health care fraud contained in nine qui tam cases. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 1:29 pm
There, the court addressed coverage under Pfizer’s 2004-2005 insurance tower for an underlying securities class action, Morabito, et. al v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 4:02 am
Earlier this year, the Irwig et al. study confirmed (“Persistent Sexual Side Effects of Finasteride for Male Pattern Hair Loss“) what the Traish et al. study (“Adverse side effects of 5? [read post]
2 Aug 2014, 6:05 am
Niven v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued October 16, 2012 Decided January 22, 2013 No. 11-1265 AMERICANS FOR SAFE ACCESS, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued October 16, 2012 Decided January 22, 2013 No. 11-1265 AMERICANS FOR SAFE ACCESS, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 5:36 pm
Minn. 2008)(noting that some but not all courts have concluded relative risks under two support finding expert witness’s opinion to be inadmissible) XYZ, et al. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 10:04 am
: (The Invent Blog), Impressive work on history of ‘Happy Birthday’ and copyright protection: (Innovationpartners), Gender and copyright: (Patry Copyright Blog) Events 1 July: US PLI: ‘Prior art & obviousness 2008: The PTO and CAFC perspective on patent law sections 102 & 103’ - New York: (Patent Docs), 1-2 July – C5 conference on intellectual asset management for high-tech industries – Paris: (c5-online.com), 2… [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am
Apotex Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
Oct. 24, 1996) Merrell Dow Pharms., Inc. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
: (Patent Docs), US: Supreme Court declines to hear final Nucleonics’ appeal in gene-silencing patent dispute with Benitec Australia: (IP Law360), (Therapeutics Daily), US: 505(b)(2) drug approvals rock - Interaction of patents and exclusivity of drugs approved by FDA under section 505(b)(2): (Patent Baristas), US: StemCells’ patents survive reexam – StemCells and Neuralstem differ on extent of changes: (Patent Docs), US: StemCells announces issuance of… [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
See also Manual at 614 n. 198., citing Ofer Shpilberg, et al., The Next Stage: Molecular Epidemiology, 50 J. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 1:32 pm
Twelve Lots of CHANTIX® (Varenicline) Tablets have been recalled by Pfizer due to N-Nitroso Varenicline content above ADI level. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 7:53 pm
In Brennan et al. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 10:37 pm
All were subject to motions to exclude under Rule 702. [read post]
